Movie Review: Hancock
by Dan on Jul.05, 2008, under Movies & Music
Hancock. Now this was a movie I’ve been waiting to see. I have to admit that I wanted to see this more than Indiana Jones. More than Hulk and The Happening too.
I figured that I’d be disappointed by this movie, but I could hope for the best, at least. I try not to read too much about movies before they come out (other that the MPAA rating and such) just so when a movie is nothing like the few previews I saw of it, I’ll be surprised.
That’s exactly the case in this movie. I went in thinking it’d be a comedy where Will Smith starts out a super hero bum and turns into a Men In Black agent-esque crime fighting champion. A black comedy meets Spiderman perhaps. Of course, when you think about it that way, it doesn’t sound like a great movie.
I don’t want to give anything away about the storyline, but if you’re looking for the Will Smith comedy routine, you’ll get a bit of it, but so much more.
Will Smith, once again, does a great job. In the past 3 movies I’ve seen of him (Pursuit of Happyness (woah, the spell-checker didn’t squawk at that), I Am Legend, and this), I’ve noticed his new signature facial expression- mouth slightly agape, teary eyes, with a seriously ticked off look on his face. Anyways, the rest of the actors are great (Jason Bateman, Charlize Theron).
I was disappointed that the movie was something like 87 minutes long, but once you actually start watching it, it seems so much longer (which, in this case, is a good thing).
One of the particularly good things was the music score. There is one song, specifically, that really just become the #1 song on my playlists: Death and Transfiguration.
[youtube:http://youtube.com/watch?v=uOa719oT4uQ]
The effects really aren’t all that special. I mean, there are certain points where they come into play, but for the most part the effects in this movie merely supplement reality instead of create a new one.
In all, it was a great movie, but there was one catch: language. There is quite a bit of it. Really, if they had backed off on that, I think they might have gotten a lot more acclaim.
Using HT’s method of rating (5-Great; 4-Good; 3-Average; 2-Bad; 1-Horrible; 0-Putrid)
4/5
July 5th, 2008 on 12:58 pm
Forgot to mention.. there is quite a shot of the better part of Will Smith’s left cheek. awwwkkkwwarrd
Dan’s last blog post..Movie Review: Hancock
July 6th, 2008 on 9:14 am
Cheek… we’ve seen it before (I, Robot). Nothin’ to write home about… Been quiet a while, but thanks for your great reviews, saved me a few $20 trips to the movies
July 6th, 2008 on 3:01 pm
Hahaha. I should just clarify- and I don’t think Tom would disagree. The movies we’ve seen lately are all worth watching (to some extent or another) unless you either object to the content or the movie doesn’t interest you.
The venue at which you view these movies is up to discretion. This movie I had no problem paying @ the theaters for. Others are better off at matinee prices, some others at places like Movies 10 ($1.75 tickets), still others are decent to rent, while others are better as Sunday afternoon Fox feature presentations.
Movies like Cloverfield should definitely occupy a screen that takes up 75% or more of your field of vision.
Dan’s last blog post..Movie Review: Hancock
July 12th, 2008 on 3:50 am
save $ and watch this instead:
http://hancock.ytmnd.com/
OhYo’s last blog post..A taste of Kentucky