Thoughts from the throne
Jan 14th, 2008
by Dan
So at work today, I found myself flipping through an issue of TIME magazine and thought I’d write about what I read (given the lacking amount of authoring coming from OhYo and HT). For those of you few people who don’t get TIME stocked upon your magazine racks at home, you might want to read that article before you continue to read this one.
Let me begin.
For any person, acknowledging the fact that the majority of people don’t mind the current government (but proclaim the opposite) and tell people that politicians run almost solely for their own ego- is quite a feat. It takes a person who is honest and quite bold to say that.
But think about it, it’s true. However, in his article, Michael Kinsley (the author, duh?) implies that this ambition is part of nature and almost.. excusable. To a degree, I agree with that, but there is so much more to the story. This idea of ambition being imparted upon graduates is not just about being the best you can be- it’s about helping society in how we act and the accomplishments we achieve. Frankly, we pervert that into being a solely self-seeking philosophy- get the best education we can, get the best job we can, get the best spouse we can, get the best car we can, have the most power we can… Granted, none of those things is inherently wrong, but it has become our society’s sole aim and focus (and when I say our society, I mean us).
I guess I don’t know where I’m going with this… As I read the article, I just got this sense of pardon from the author- like it was OK to have your ego stroked and strive only for self aggrandizement.
I’ve gotten a bit of backlash about my last post. People have called me negative, a “typical” Republican, etc. Don’t worry, I’m not “liberal bashing.” I apologize if you think so. While I don’t agree with the whole Democrat/Liberal party line, the Repubs have just as many problems when it comes to self-control and practicing some sense of morality. What I can’t stand, however, is this utter nonsense that politicians spew forth. Obama and Hillary arguing, Kerry backing Obama instead of Edwards (like his opinion really matters), Giuliani trying to sound moralistic when he’s had more wives/mistresses than Dick Cheney has had heart surgeries. I could go on about the bickering between Huckabee and Romney and allegations of campaign fund fraud, but I won’t.
The candidate who can rise to the level of being selfless in their ambition, humble about their accomplishments, and become more than just “the black guy”, “the woman”, “the POW”, “the mormon”, “the Christian”, or whatever their social sect might be- that person is who will be getting my vote.
I really need to stop writing about politics.
The problem is that none of those candidates falls into the category you’ve described.
As I read your post though it made me think about how its just a simple form of materialism and humanism. We strive to get better and more of everything and we become our own gods. Its a sad state of affairs, although quite frankly its been going on for a long time.
HT’s last blog post.. Christmas Music?
Yep. That’s how it goes. Unfortunately, the more humble portion of the populus will never aspire to become president. Its a bit of a catch 22.
And for the record, I can be idealistic if I want to be- it’s working for Ron Paul, right?
Dan’s last blog post.. Thoughts from the throne
Good thoughts… Though I’d hope that the person in “The Christian” chair would indeed lead the country in Godly ways like all countries ought. Sadly though it seems like most ‘Christians’ nowadays are merely hypocrites.
ZePuKa’s last blog post.. Dude, you threw off my groove
Including the one in that ‘char’ I’m afraid.
HT’s last blog post.. Christmas Music?
char? OO-BLAH BLAH
chair* - okay so I missed a letter.
HT’s last blog post.. Christmas Music?
Do you mean the allegations of legal-yet-shady contributions? From what I heard, he was being strung up for getting free eats at a diner or something of the sort.
Dan’s last blog post.. Thoughts from the throne
No that’s not what I’m referring to - but that’s interesting in and of itself. I’m actually talking about his less than Christian actions on the campaign trail while somehow suggesting that the one true reason why you should vote for him is that he is a Christian. At least based on his policy ideas that’s the only idea I can surmise why someone who espouses to be conservative would vote for him. Okay maybe the flat tax thing, but other than that he’s got nothing to his record.
Ooo listen to me I’m letting my zomgee political post of the future get away from me. I’ll save the rest for later methinks.
HT’s last blog post.. Christmas Music?
hm… which one are you referring to?
ZePuKa’s last blog post.. Dude, you threw off my groove